eGospodarka.pl
eGospodarka.pl poleca

PracaGrupypl.praca.dyskusjePalenie bierne legalnym powodem rzucenia pracyPalenie bierne legalnym powodem rzucenia pracy
  • Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!agh.edu.pl!news.agh.edu.pl!news.onet.pl!newsfeed.gazeta
    .pl!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!ngpe
    er.news.aol.com!audrey-m1.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
    Lines: 79
    X-Admin: n...@a...com
    From: a...@a...com (A78p2w)
    Newsgroups: pl.praca.dyskusje
    Date: 03 May 2003 02:38:32 GMT
    Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
    Subject: Palenie bierne legalnym powodem rzucenia pracy
    Mime-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    Message-ID: <2...@m...aol.com>
    Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.praca.dyskusje:79107
    [ ukryj nagłówki ]

    Tymczasem w Nowej Szkocji (Kanada) bo Zatonski wzial lapowke za polska ustawe
    tytoniowa:
    http://tajnedokumenty.com/gis1.html



    Former worker in smoky casino wins EI claim
     
    By Peter McLaughlin


    The Daily News

    Friday, May 02, 2003

    CREDIT: FILE

     
    A federal panel has ruled second-hand smoke posed a health hazard for casino
    worker Andrea Skinner.

     
    ADVERTISEMENT




    Andrea Skinner, the blackjack dealer who walked away from her job at Casino
    Nova Scotia because of exposure to second-hand smoke, has won her claim for
    employment insurance benefits.
    A federal EI board of referees ruled yesterday the 30-year-old Halifax woman
    had just cause to leave her job.
    ?There is sufficient evidence to substantiate the hazards of second-hand smoke
    in the workplace,? panel chairman Lucien Paul Hebert wrote in granting
    Skinner?s appeal.
    It?s a decision that could have ramifications for the province?s smoke-free
    places law, which has been criticized for not protecting all workers from
    second-hand smoke.
    Skinner, who quit last December after working seven years at the casino?s smoky
    gaming tables, said the ruling is an important one for workplace safety.
    ?The casino could be a perfectly safe workplace if it was smoke-free,? she
    said. ?There?s a lot of smoke, I can tell you from experience. The smoke that
    hangs in the place is very thick, and there?s just no getting away from it.?
    Skinner, who now works as a part-time clerk at a liquor store, quit the casino,
    claiming cigarette smoke was making her ill.
    She launched an appeal after Human Resources Development Canada rejected her
    claim for benefits in January.
    Casino Nova Scotia and HRDC can still appeal the tribunal?s decision.
    Casino officials weren?t commenting on the decision yesterday, except to say
    that Skinner never expressed concern over her health as the reason for her
    resignation.
    Premier John Hamm congratulated Skinner on her win, but he said the decision
    won?t stop him from pushing ahead with government?s plan to pass legislation
    giving cabinet the power to exempt the casino from municipal smoking bylaws.
    ?I?m always concerned about the environments workers are working in, and we?ll
    try to provide the maximum amount of worker protection,? he said.
    ?On the other hand, we?re dealing with a very, very unusual case because we
    have a very, very unusual contract down at the casino, one that seems to
    protect the casino far more than it protects anyone else.?
    But NDP health critic Maureen MacDonald said the government must do the right
    thing by casino workers, as well as others in the hospitality industry, and
    abandon its plan to shield the casinos.
    ?The government is weak-kneed, and they are not prepared to do the right
    thing,? she said. ?It is a house of cards; it is slowly falling in on them.
    They can?t duck their responsibility with respect to workers in these work
    places.?
    Danny Hewitt, spokesman for the Nova Scotia Restaurant and Food Services
    Association, said the decision will give the anti-smoking lobby more
    ammunition, but it won?t mean hospitality workers will suddenly quit in droves.
    Most in the restaurant business don?t have the hours to collect EI; nor are
    there that many who are constantly exposed to smoke, as casino workers are.
    ?There will be people out there who will use it as an example against us, but
    it really isn?t the same thing. I just can?t see it ever being an issue,?
    Hewitt said.
    p...@h...ca

    Š Copyright  2003 The Daily News


Podziel się

Poleć ten post znajomemu poleć

Wydrukuj ten post drukuj

Najnowsze wątki z tej grupy


Najnowsze wątki

Szukaj w grupach

Eksperci egospodarka.pl

1 1 1