eGospodarka.pl
eGospodarka.pl poleca

PracaGrupypl.praca.szukanaMI5 Persecution: Data Protection application to Keith Hill MP, 2002
Ilość wypowiedzi w tym wątku: 1

  • 1. Data: 2006-11-30 03:15:47
    Temat: MI5 Persecution: Data Protection application to Keith Hill MP, 2002
    Od: M...@m...gov.uk


    Data Protection application to Keith Hill MP, 2002

    In May 2002 I made a subject access application under the Data Protection Act 1998
    to Keith Hill, my local MP. I was interested
    to see who he had spoken to during 1997-1999, when we were communicating by letter.
    The Information Commissioner's office told
    me that Mr Hill had been convicted in May 2000 under the DPA, presumably by omission
    of knowing the relevant law; consequently
    Mr Hill was more helpful than usual in his response to my application. For the sake
    of interest, I reproduce the Evening Standard
    news report here.

    Coupled to my data protection application, I asked Mr Hill;

    Additionally I ask the non-data-protection question of whether you spoke to the
    Police about me, about our communications or my
    faxes to Parliament, either in April 2000 or at any other time. Please identify any
    such communications.

    His response consisted of a computer printout, with covering letter, which are shown
    here. His letter says he may have spoken to
    Police about the faxes Parliament had been receiving, but his memory is unclear "at
    this remove in time". I suspect that his memory
    would allow him to remember whether or not he complained to Police two years
    previously; but it would not be to his advantage to
    remember, would it.

    The data printout spells out that I asked for Mr Hill's assistance against "BBC news
    readers who are spying on him through the
    television." It also contains a reference of Mr Hill's office referring my case to
    Social Services, to whom I am unknown. "Presents
    Challenging Issues" sounds a code, like the nursing UNDY = "Unfortunately Not Dead
    Yet" (but we continue to hope).

    I wrote again to Mr Hill on 13 May and told him I did not accept his apparent memory
    lapse regarding the police. I asked him to
    elucidate; in his response of 17 May he said he was unable to add to his earlier note
    on this point.

    159


    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

strony : [ 1 ]


Szukaj w grupach

Szukaj w grupach

Eksperci egospodarka.pl

1 1 1